The mechanism underlying hypertriglyceridemia-associated insulin resistance in humans remains poorly understood. It has been proposed that hypertriglyceridemia only produces insulin resistance when associated with an increased lipid delivery to muscle. Accordingly, hypertriglyceridemia secondary to a decreased clearance of triglyceride-rich particles should not cause insulin resistance. To verify this hypothesis, we assessed whole body and adipose tissue insulin sensitivity in 15 healthy male volunteers before and after a 5-day administration of isotretinoin (1 mg/kg/d), a vitamin A derivative that decreases the clearance of triglyceride-rich particles. Whole body insulin-mediated glucose disposal (6,6 (2)H(2)glucose), glucose oxidation (indirect calorimetry), lipolysis ((2)H(5) glycerol), and subcutaneous adipose lipolysis (microdialysis) were evaluated during a 3-step hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp. Isotretinoin increased plasma triglyceride from 0.97 +/- 0.15 to 1.30 +/- 0.22 mmol/L (P < .02), but did not change whole body insulin-mediated glucose disposal and lipolysis. These observations are consistent with an isotretinoin-induced inhibition of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL)-triglyceride clearance. The suppression of endogenous glucose production and the reduction in subcutaneous adipose glycerol concentrations by insulin remained equally unaffected after isotretinoin administration. We conclude that the impaired clearance of triglyceride-rich particles secondary to a 5-day isotretinoin administration does not impair insulin-mediated antilipolysis or glucose disposal. The data support the concept that hypertriglyceridemia-associated insulin resistance develops primarily when triglyceride production is increased.

Polls results

On a scale of 1 to 10, rate how much this article will change your clinical practice?

NO change
BIG change
0% Article relates to my practice (0/0)
0% Article does not relate to my practice (0/0)
0% Undecided (0/0)

Will this article lead to more cost-effective healthcare?

0% Yes (0/0)
0% No (0/0)
0% Undecided (0/0)

Was this article biased? (commercial or personal)

0% Yes (0/0)
0% No (0/0)
0% Undecided (0/0)

What level of evidence do you think this article is?

0% Level 1 (0/0)
0% Level 2 (0/0)
0% Level 3 (0/0)
0% Level 4 (0/0)
0% Level 5 (0/0)